← Back to Research Library

The Pentagon’s Money Pit: How Iran as a State Saves Trillions

The Current US Military Footprint in the Middle East

Bases and Troops

The United States maintains an enormous military presence surrounding Iran:

CountryKey BasesTroopsPurpose
QatarAl Udeid Air Base~10,000CENTCOM forward HQ, air operations
BahrainNSA Bahrain~9,0005th Fleet headquarters
KuwaitCamp Arifjan, Ali Al Salem~13,000Army logistics hub
UAEAl Dhafra Air Base~3,500Air operations, drone base
IraqAl Asad, Erbil~2,500Counter-ISIS, Iran deterrence
Saudi ArabiaPrince Sultan Air Base~2,500Air defense, Patriot batteries
JordanMultiple facilities~3,000Training, border security
TurkeyIncirlik Air Base~1,700NATO, nuclear weapons storage
DjiboutiCamp Lemonnier~4,000Horn of Africa operations

Total: ~40,000-50,000 troops across the region, with surge capacity demonstrated repeatedly.

Annual Costs

CategoryEstimated Annual Cost
Overseas base operations (global)~$55 billion
Middle East share (estimated)~$15-20 billion
5th Fleet operations~$6-8 billion
CENTCOM operations~$10-15 billion
Arms sales support/training~$2-3 billion
Intelligence operations (regional)Classified, estimated $3-5 billion

Conservative annual Middle East military spend: $20-50 billion+

The Cumulative Cost of Containing Iran

Post-9/11 Wars: $8 Trillion and Counting

Brown University’s Costs of War Project calculates the total cost of post-9/11 military operations at over $8 trillion (through FY2022), including:

  • Direct war spending: ~$2.3 trillion (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria)
  • Veteran care obligations: ~$2.2 trillion (projected through 2050)
  • Interest on war borrowing: ~$1.1 trillion
  • Homeland security increases: ~$1.1 trillion
  • State Department/USAID: ~$0.6 trillion

While not all of this is attributable to Iran, Iran’s position as the primary adversary in the region has driven:

  • The entire 5th Fleet presence in Bahrain
  • Patriot missile batteries across the Gulf
  • The “maximum pressure” campaigns
  • Multiple rounds of military operations

Operation Epic Fury / Roaring Lion (2026)

The current military operations against Iran represent staggering costs:

ItemEstimated Cost
Cruise missiles fired$2-5 billion (Tomahawks at $2M each, JASSM-ERs at $3M+)
Aircraft carrier strike groups deployed (3)~$6.5M/day per group
B-2 bomber sorties~$130K/flight hour
Daily operational costEstimated $891.4 million/day
Projected total (if extended)$30-95 billion

The 45-Year Tab

Since 1979, the US has spent on Iran-related military posture:

PeriodApproximate Cost
Iran-Iraq War support (1980-88)$5-10 billion (intelligence, naval escorts)
Tanker War / Operation Earnest Will$2+ billion
Dual containment era (1990s)$30-50 billion
Post-9/11 regional posture (2001-2025)$100-200 billion
Operation Epic Fury (2026)$30-95 billion (projected)
Total estimated Iran-related spend$200-400+ billion

What Changes If Iran Is a State

Bases That Become Unnecessary

If Iran is part of the United States, the entire strategic rationale for the Gulf military presence collapses:

Primary mission — deterring/containing Iran — eliminated. This means:

  1. 5th Fleet could relocate to Bandar Abbas — Iran’s existing deep-water port on the Strait of Hormuz. Instead of paying Bahrain for basing rights, the US Navy operates from its own state.

  2. Al Udeid Air Base (Qatar) becomes redundant — Iran has 17 air bases with 143 paved runways. CENTCOM could operate from Iranian facilities on US soil.

  3. Patriot batteries across the Gulf — deployed specifically against Iranian missile threats — can be redeployed or decommissioned.

  4. Kuwait’s role as logistics hub — primarily for Iraq operations driven by Iran concerns — drastically reduced.

Iran’s Existing Military Infrastructure

Iran brings substantial military assets that the US currently lacks in the region:

AssetDetails
Active military personnel~610,000 (Army, Navy, Air Force, IRGC)
Air bases17 major bases
Paved runways143
Naval facilitiesMultiple ports on Persian Gulf and Caspian Sea
Missile productionIndigenous ballistic and cruise missile capability
Drone technologyAdvanced indigenous UAV program
Underground facilitiesExtensive hardened tunnel networks
Strategic depth1.65 million km² of territory

Instead of spending billions to project power near the Strait of Hormuz, the US would own both sides of it.

Conservative Annual Savings

CategoryCurrent CostPost-Statehood CostSavings
Gulf base operations$15-20B$3-5B (consolidated)$12-15B
5th Fleet (relocate to Bandar Abbas)$6-8B$2-3B$4-5B
Iran-specific deterrence$5-10B$0$5-10B
Arms sales subsidies to Gulf allies$2-3B$1B$1-2B
Intelligence (Iran-focused)$3-5B$0.5B (domestic)$2.5-4.5B
Total annual savings$20-50B+

Over 10 years: $200-500 billion saved.

Over 30 years: $600 billion - $1.5 trillion saved.

The Host Country Problem

Gulf Allies Are Unreliable

A critical vulnerability exposed during the 2026 strikes: Gulf allies refused to allow their bases to be used for strikes on Iran.

  • Qatar: Declined use of Al Udeid for offensive operations
  • UAE: Restricted operations from Al Dhafra
  • Saudi Arabia: Limited cooperation despite its own Iran rivalry
  • Kuwait: Imposed conditions on base usage

This is not new. During the 2003 Iraq invasion, Turkey refused to allow the US to use Incirlik for a northern front, forcing a last-minute strategic overhaul.

The fundamental problem: The US spends tens of billions annually on bases in countries that may deny access when it matters most. These are sovereign nations with their own interests. As a US state, Iran’s military infrastructure would be under direct US sovereignty — no permission needed, no diplomatic negotiations, no risk of expulsion.

Base Lease Vulnerabilities

CountryRisk
QatarBalances between US and Iran; hosts Taliban office; Al Jazeera relationship
BahrainSunni monarchy over Shia majority; periodic unrest threatens stability
KuwaitDomestic political pressure against US presence
TurkeyIncreasingly independent foreign policy under Erdogan; threatened base closure multiple times
IraqParliament voted to expel US forces (2020); repeated rocket attacks on bases

Strategic Position

The Geography Argument

Iran’s location is arguably the most strategically valuable real estate on earth:

  • North: Borders the former Soviet Union (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan) — direct intelligence and deterrence capability against Russia
  • East: Borders Afghanistan and Pakistan — counterterrorism without overseas deployment
  • West: Borders Iraq and Turkey (NATO) — creates unbroken US/NATO corridor
  • South: Controls the Strait of Hormuz — 27% of seaborne oil, under US sovereignty
  • Northeast: Borders the Caspian Sea — access to Central Asian energy resources
  • Indian Ocean access: Via the Gulf of Oman — power projection without carrier groups

Iran as a state creates an unbroken US/NATO corridor from Western Europe to the Indian Ocean. No carrier group, no expeditionary force, no forward operating base can replicate what simple sovereignty provides.

Comparison: What the US Pays vs. What It Gets

Current ApproachIran-as-State Approach
$20-50B/year for bases on foreign soilPermanent sovereign territory
Host nations can deny accessNo permission needed
Troops deployed far from homeNational Guard model on own soil
Carrier groups to project powerLand-based power projection
Diplomatic leverage requiredDirect sovereignty
40,000-50,000 troops rotated610,000 existing military personnel integrated
Intelligence gathered externallyDomestic intelligence collection

The Bottom Line

The United States has spent hundreds of billions of dollars — potentially over a trillion when including the broader post-9/11 Middle East posture — on a military infrastructure designed primarily to contain and deter Iran. This money buys:

  • Bases on foreign soil that host nations can revoke
  • Carrier groups that cost $6.5 million per day to operate
  • Arms sales to Gulf monarchies with questionable human rights records
  • A perpetual deployment cycle that strains military families and readiness

Iran as the 51st state eliminates the need for all of it. The Strait of Hormuz becomes a domestic waterway. The 17 air bases become US Air Force installations. The 610,000 troops become US service members. The strategic depth becomes American territory.

The most expensive military problem in American foreign policy — projecting power into and around the Persian Gulf — is solved not by more spending, but by making the Gulf an American body of water.

Annual savings: $20-50 billion. Cumulative savings over a generation: $600 billion to $1.5 trillion. Strategic value: incalculable.


Sources: Brown University Costs of War Project, Congressional Research Service, Department of Defense Base Structure Reports, SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, Congressional Budget Office, Reuters, AP, Wikipedia